Skip to main content

Boomerang by Michael Lewis - My take on the book

Michael Lewis is an interesting writer and i have read his books Liar's Poker and The Big Short. These were easy to read and informative too. In Boomerang, he travels to five countries and writes about the present state of economic crisis and how those countries got into it. He does all this, to his credit, in his easy and readable style. 

Michael Lewis does try to give a certain perspective/insight in to the problems/issues facing these countries. It is one big problem of cheap credit and over borrowing all over and he brings in the individual national character while trying to provide the insight.  I should say that he does succeed to a certain, albeit,  very small extent. But  in the process ends up stereotyping every nation. But considering the nature of the problem, he has gone overboard with his stereo type thing if you ask me, and sounds very childish too, as in the case of Germany.

He doesn't have a solution as such to the problems all these countries including the US, are facing. While it is too much to expect a book of this nature to provide any solution to the present economic issues facing the world, Michael Lewis actually ends up confusing the reader in the below paragraph.

"When people pile up debts they will find difficult and perhaps even impossible to repay, they are saying several things at once. They are obviously saying that they want more than they can immediately afford. They are saying, less obviously, that their present wants are so important that, to satisfy them, it is worth some future difficulty. But in making that bargain they are implying that, when the future difficulty arrives, they’ll figure it out. They don’t always do that. But you can never rule out the possibility that they will. As idiotic as optimism can sometimes seem, it has a weird habit of paying off." 


Is the author  telling his readers to be optimistic since optimism has a weird habit of paying off? I am not sure. Reading this book is like eating fast food. Tastes good while it lasts, but provides no real nourishment. 


In short, i am disappointed with this book. Borrow and read, if you have to or read it on the net as Vanity Fair articles. but don't buy it.  Hint: The chapters are all available online, if you search for it. 

Comments

  1. My theory is any economic crisis is due to GREED either by a group or a power individual, why write a book about it and why read it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Vasudevan, thanks for your comment. While there is an element of truth in it, i would say that it is oversimplification to say that all economic crisis is due to greed.

    While one can obviously not do anything about human greed per se, one can ensure that the factors which resulted in humans acting greedily can be brought under control. that is why it is important to study these economic crisis. :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kano Model of Customer Satisfaction - Notes to Self

Note: What follows is the notes taken from my study of Kano's model of Customer Satisfaction. I came across this model when i wanted to know if there was a structured approach that would help me prioritize features for software product development. 

To evaluate a product or service, following parameters are very important

The value provided - this helps attract customersThe Quality offered - This earns customer respectProduct or Service innovation - This helps differentiate from competition
But these are not perceived directly, but indirectly through the product and it's features. Kano's model help to group product features into 3 categories ( 6 categories, but only 3 are important) and there by makes it feasible to deliver value at a promised quality while offering innovation. 

The 3 important feature categories are 
Basic featuresLinear featuresExciters or DelightersBasic features are that must be present in the product to be successful. They are also referred to as must have…

Knowns, Unknowns and Project Management...

This article is a draft of a paper i started to write in september 2007 and left it where you see it today.  The purpose is to to come out with a conceptual framework through which “the knowledge needed to successfully execute a project” can be viewed and gauged and presents a brief outline of the same. As always comments are most welcome...
Financial Resources, Domain, Technology, Communication, Cultural Differences, Organizational Structure, Organizational Culture and Power Play within an organization are some of the factors that have an ultimate bearing on the success of a project.
All projects come in shades of grey is a fact that has to be acknowledged. For example, when we start a project, very rarely do we know everything about Project Requirement, Scope and other factors that impact the project. There will be lot of ambiguity and this ambiguity has to be accepted and put to proper use.
But the problem is that people usually look at these factors in black and white. This may be ac…

Aggressive Schedules - Few thoughts...

During my early years in the software industry, i used to look at people who worked in projects with aggressive schedules, in awe. The people working in such projects talked about, long hours, working week ends and heroic endeavors in their projects. The people who worked in such projects were given more awards and rewards, compared to others. i thought that this was the way to be.

After working in projects with aggressive schedules, I realized that what I saw was only the silver lining and there was a big dark cloud behind this ( talk about what experience can do for you). The common thread that linked all the projects was that all of them exhibited one or more of the following.
Project ended up delayed by more than 100% Project got cancelled Project got de-scopedProject has a high cost of maintenance.  Having been burnt up by working in projects with “Aggressive Schedules’, (henceforth denoted as AS), I understand that projects with aggressive schedules cause more damage than what we …